Sinica Podcast: Samm Sacks and Paul Triolo on Huawei and Chinese tech - SupChina

Sinica Podcast: Samm Sacks and Paul Triolo on Huawei and Chinese tech

This week’s Sinica Podcast is now live.

This week on the Sinica Podcast, Kaiser and Jeremy speak with Samm Sacks, Cybersecurity Policy and Chinese Digital Economy Fellow at New America, and Paul Triolo, Geotechnology Practice Head at the Eurasia Group. The two are among the best positioned to discuss the implications of the shocking arrest of Huawei CFO Mèng Wǎnzhōu 孟晚舟 in Vancouver on December 1. The discussion focuses primarily on technological and national security aspects of the clash between Washington and Beijing, how Meng’s arrest fits into that clash, and the realities of fragmentation in the global telecommunications industry.

What to listen for on this week’s Sinica Podcast:

19:53: China’s new Cybersecurity Law was a cause of concern for MNCs and tech specialists alike. Samm elaborates on specific actions taken by the Chinese government: “If you look at the enforcement actions that have been taken against that law so far, the vast majority of them are aimed at Chinese companies. Really, they haven’t implemented it as much on foreign companies…and there are things like content violations…domestic cybersecurity issues. I think a lot of these fears are being bundled up together and creating this larger tech fear.”

23:03: During a recent visit to Zhejiang University, Paul and Samm spoke with a professor who wrote a book on Huawei’s corporate culture and described it as such: “It’s kind of like a car going 60 miles an hour on the highway and changing a tire at the same time.”

28:13: The extent to which Huawei can push back against the government and the degree to which Beijing is able to strong-arm private companies under China’s Internet Security Law remain largely opaque. However, gaining the trust of the international community has proved to be a steep uphill battle for Huawei: “Huawei is a global company, operating in 170 countries. If it became clear that Huawei was simply an arm of the Chinese government and was doing Beijing’s bidding at every turn, it wouldn’t be able to operate as a global company. The problem here is that the company is forced to prove a negative.”

38:27: Paul speaks about the globalization of supply chains: “…the problem is, for 30 years, companies have been told, ‘Optimize your supply chains and go to places like China,’ where there has been cheaper labor. But now it’s really more about skilled labor, not about cheaper labor — it’s about skilled engineers. Foxconn can build a facility to build iPhones in Zhejiang and easily find 30,000 engineers to staff it up, but when it goes to Wisconsin, it has a lot of problems.”

Listen now to: Huawei and the tech cold war


One Comment

  1. Daniel Ryan Reply

    Thanks, guys for another well put together show, and asking normal person questions to explain out the perhaps unknown concepts or definitions.

    More and more, the overarching China topic is either gleaning or directly stating China’s underlying goal to their global business and development push. Whether it be in the tech industry, exporting infrastructure, scientific exploration or other soft power channels.

    Western media can’t seem to get this slant out of their narratives. However I haven’t been too aware of articles or reports or podcasts trying to do comparative analyses. For example this particular podcast didn’t provide much info or structural gameplans of Samsung and Apple. For example how do we know Apple isn’t spying on Chinese people for the US government.

    Of course as I had that idea and wrote it down, I kinda chuckled, knowing that in itself is a judgement call. In the same way I seem to naturally trust America’s big companies don’t act part and parcel with the US government at the same time I naturally mistrust Chinese companies because I think they must be controlled in some way by Zhongnanhai.

    I am not a Panda hugger, too far from it. But in order to have a fair discussion it seems we also need to offer a comparison, if possible, in some cases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.